An affordable net zero house retrofit

Headlines such as “Average cost for net zero retrofit almost £70k” make the task of CO2 reduction seem daunting or unaffordable.  It doesn’t have to be that way.  I describe affordable and available technologies that allowed me to make my home carbon neutral for around £10k, verified by detailed energy measurements over several years.  The solutions also make living through increasingly frequent heat waves bearable and even comfortable. 

Conventional wisdom and solutions suggest that cutting emissions is a hobby for the wealthy. Technological solutions are too expensive for the majority of householders. This is not true.

‘Conventional’ solutions are simply too expensive for individuals or the country to afford, but there is a better way.

The chart below shows that if we count electricity from a renewable energy supply as zero emissions then we are better than net zero. If we count the carbon intensity of electricity at grid average then we have reduced our CO2 by 80%.

A quick win is to replace all lights by LED.

We installed solar panels without a battery early on, and the conservatory also captures solar energy (not included in the £10k as it was built for the space rather than energy reduction).

By far the biggest part of the energy footprint of a house is the heating. We need to minimise the energy in. We can do this by minimising the heat out and by optimising the efficiency of the heat generator (conventionally a boiler).

Lots of companies offer ‘wonder solutions’ online, but don’t be caught out by scams such as these:

Professionals have been ‘duped’ by rogue products such as the one below whose claims broke the first law of thermodynamics.

External wall insulation is just too expensive! Cavity wall insulation is great, and affordable, but a better solution is needed for solid walls. Physics tells us that there are decreasing returns from increasing the thickness of insulation. Just 20mm can be very effective.

Underfloor insulation is cheap from a material point of view, but disruptive and labour intensive. We needed to replace our joists and floorboards anyway so it was a cheap and obvious improvement. We tried two different insulation approaches – the solid insulation board was simplest and is the way I’d do it again.

The biggest benefit from double or triple glazing is the poor heat transfer between air and the surface of the glass, rather than the insulating property of glass or the air gap. We achieved this by a simple improvement to the original door glass and windows.

Curtains also reduce heat loss by the same mechanism. The thickness of the curtain material is less important than simply preventing the air passing from one side to another. The following temperature measurements either side of the curtain show the benefit when they are closed.

The biggest benefit in energy saving can come from choosing the best heat generator. The traditional approach is to use a gas boiler:

In contrast to converting chemical energy in the boiler to heat, a heat pump uses electrical energy to pump heat from the cold outside to the warm inside using the same thermodynamic process that cools the fridge and freezer in our kitchens.

Government promoted air to water heat pumps have a LOT of disadvantages, and will probably cost a little more to run than a gas boiler. No wonder they are not taking off!

A far better alternative is a traditional air conditioning unit, which is an air to air heat pump – warming the air in the house directly and efficiently. It can be installed without touching the existing boiler and radiator system, which can be retained as a back-up.

If you have nowhere to fit the outside unit of the heat pump, there are self contained units available that might solve the problem. They are slightly less efficient but are worth considering.

Don’t be misled by people who say heat pumps don’t work in cold weather. They do – although they will pump slightly less heat than in warm weather.

With any heating system, you will reach a point where you can’t get enough heat into the house to maintain the temperature.

We fitted a DEFRA wood burning stove, and use waste wood that we season as fuel. This is carbon neutral as the wood would rot and give off it’s CO2 anyway.

Energy measurements show that for the same heating demand (average outside temperature) the heat pump saves a large proportion of our energy – even when it is very cold. The total energy below includes heating, water heating, cooking, washing, TV etc. i.e. everything!

From the average daily gas and electricity use before and after the heat pump we can work out how much we have saved by fitting the air to air heat pump:

When buying a heat pump, it’s important to get the most efficient model. The cost difference will quickly pay back in energy savings, and the CO2 saving will be biggest.

Just a reminder of what can be done:

Housing is only a proportion of our CO2 footprint. The data below allows us to consider the benefit of changes to our life choices.

It’s a stark fact that those who are suffering most from our high CO2 production are those who produce least themselves and who are least able to bear the consequences. My wife and I run a small charity that sends funds to help some of the most vulnerable in Mozambique. A simple breeze block house can be life-changing, but will only cost around £1300. If you would like to join us in helping those in greatest need, or if you have simply found this helpful then please donate to the account below.

A heat pump strategy that works.

The government heat pump strategy is on the rocks.  I present an alternative, with data to prove that it would work.

The government is offering a ‘boiler upgrade scheme’ whereby the present boiler is replaced by a heat pump.  This is failing because the cost of the heat pump are typically over £7000[i].  And on top of that, radiators may need to be increased in size in order to provide the same heat as the boiler that is being replaced.  Installation would be disruptive and take many days.  People are unfamiliar with the technology (although it is in their fridge) and don’t want to risk it not working properly, or the efficiency gains not being as high as expected.  The approach is an ‘all or nothing’ approach, whereby the existing heat source is scrapped and fully replaced – there is no going back if it doesn’t work.

An approach that would work, and which I have demonstrated successfully in my own home, is to provide a high efficiency heat source that provides a base load of heat in addition to the present boiler system

The high efficiency heat source uses heat pump technology, but without the complication of integrating with a water radiator system.  The ratio of heat out to electricity in is around 4 to 1, which is better than that of the boiler replacement heat pump which in practice only offers around 2.7 times as much heat as the electricity it consumes[ii].

The technology is air conditioning air to air heat pumps. It is well proven, and we encounter it every day without realising it in shops, offices, and hotel rooms.  It works.  It is many times cheaper, simpler, and faster to instal.  And in addition it can provide cooling to make life tolerable in heat waves – something that will be more important in the future.

Let me describe our application.  We have a traditional 3-bedroom semi-detached house built around 1930.  we have fitted an air-to-air heat pump in our hallway, which provides around 4kW heat for around 1kW electricity.   Installation took half a day, with minimal disruption.  The outdoor unit is on the wall back-to-back with the internal unit, with no pipe runs inside the house.  The cost was under £1500, a fraction of what we were quoted for air to water systems.

We retained our gas combi-boiler to provide hot water, and to allow us to top up the heat if needed.

For every kilowatt hour (kWh) electricity to the heat pump, the gas usage reduces by 4 kWh.  The question is how many kWh the heat pump can provide.  Our house needs around 7000kWh heat per year, using up to 60kWh gas per day in mid-winter.  A 4kW heat pump running flat out could provide 4kW x 24hr = 96kWh of heat per day – more than enough to eliminate the need for the gas boiler, and offering the possibility to reduce our energy use by 75%.

But how did it perform in practice?  It performed well! 

The chart below shows our total energy use, which includes heating, cooking, washing up, showering, watching TV – everything.  As you can see achieved big energy savings.  Not quite 75% each month, but dramatic.  Over the heating season we saved 5500kWh of energy.  Since the cost of electricity is much higher than gas, at today’s tariffs you won’t expect to save a lot of money (we saved less than £50 over the winter) UPDATE – WITH THE NEW ENERGY CAP RATES THIS WILL SAVE US £180 PER YEAR . 

In order for the heat to spread around the house we set the heat pump temperature to maximum, and to maximise the heat into the house we left it running overnight in the coldest weather.  Both of these reduced the real saving compared to the theoretical, but both made the house warmer and more comfortable.  Remember that this approach still leaves the opportunity of using the gas boiler.

Although it is important not to use the cooling function unless really necessary, the technology makes life manageable in the ten or so days of extreme temperature in the summer.

So what’s the way forward?

If you are willing to spend £1500 to cut drastically cut your carbon footprint and save you £1200 each year then why not just go for it. 

Or perhaps the government might adopt a strategy to encourage roll-out.

The government has set aside £450 million for the boiler upgrade scheme, offering £5000 per installation[iii]. If successful, that would provide the less efficient heat pump solution to 90,000 homes – and only in households that can afford the difference between the grant and the actual cost.

Instead, it could channel the same budget into air conditioning heat pumps as described above, offering perhaps £1000 per home, that would provide highly efficient heat pump solutions to 450,000 homes – including those who are less well off. 

We have found that several friends and acquaintances have followed our example, having seen how the technology works, and so the 450,000 homes might well encourage another two homes each, giving a total of nearly one and a half million homes saving 5000kWh each per year. Now that would be a heat pump strategy that worked.


[i] https://energysavingtrust.org.uk/advice/air-source-heat-pumps/

[ii] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/606818/DECC_RHPP_161214_Final_Report_v1-13.pdf

[iii] https://www.greenmatch.co.uk/blog/clean-heat-grant